Friday, 8 June 2012

Poor Surrey face battle to save game

A see-saw game sawed away from Surrey on day three as Sussex, led by another inspired Luke Wells innings, took complete control of the match. The classy young left hander now averages 101 in three matches against us. Surrey go into the final day 188 runs in arrears with nine second innings wickets still intact.

Sussex began the day 90-6, reeling from the burst from Stuart Meaker the previous day but the Surrey quick would not add to his tally of three wickets. The Sussex tail enders, along with Wells, conspired to add a monumental 264 runs to effectively bat us out of the game.

It was a depressingly familiar situation, too many times this season and in seasons before we have allowed tail end batsmen to get away with murder. Clearly the pitch was no minefield but for the final four batting pairs to add 140 runs more than our entire team managed is unacceptable. That included an entertaining (if you're a Sussex fan) 80 run partnership from James Anyon and Monty Panesar. Yes, that Monty Panesar. We were unusually poor in the field as the day wore on, perhaps because heads were beginning to drop.

To ram home the point that this is a problem, the average tenth wicket partnership against us this season is 26. To put that into perspective the average third wicket partnership against us is 22, and the average fourth wicket partnership is 27. We are adept at reducing top orders to dribbling messes, but don't seem able to clean up the tail. With bowlers of such talent it is hard to say what is the problem, I can only come to the conclusion that it is a failure to formulate plans for lower order batsmen. It's that or a failure to execute those plans, either way, it's not good.

Meaker, Lewis and Kartik plugged away and at least managed to keep the runs down in tricky windy conditions, but Dernbach and Batty failed to do the same. Dernbach was particularly poor, although he was unlucky not to pick up a couple of wickets late in the day. At one point he had only bowled just eight of 95 overs, a sure sign that his captain had no confidence in him. Between them, Dernbach and Batty bowled 26 overs all told, for one wicket (Batty got Panesar to end the innings) and 123 runs at almost 5 runs per over.

So from a position where we might've hoped for a small first innings lead, or at the least a deficit around the 50 mark, Sussex's lead in the end was 227 and all hope of victory was long gone. Jason Roy and Mark Ramprakash emerged to open our reply and had 14 tricky overs to face. Ramps was subdued as Roy took the bulk of the strike and played a very sensible innings to his great credit. His demise was brought about only by a brute of a delivery from Magoffin which reared up from a good length. That delivery, and a couple that snapped and bounced from Panesar will be giving the batsmen nightmares.

Ramprakash and nightwatchman Meaker saw the final 11 balls of the day out as Surrey closed on 39-1 with a mountain to climb, or if not climb, at least not fall off. What will tomorrow bring? The weather looks set fair so we probably won't be able to rely on any rain. It would be magnificent to see Ramprakash return to form to save the game, but that would be very much against the grain. You have to assume the bulk of the work will have to be done by Davies, Maynard (if he has recovered - he was off the field for the entire day after sustaining minor injuries in a car accident) and the captain.

If we make it through tomorrow unscathed there will be some positives to draw on, but we will have the weather to thank for avoiding an embarrassing defeat. If we do get rolled over cheaply, defeat will be nothing less than we deserve. After this game Adams has a month free of Championship cricket to work out what his best side is. He needs to decide who plays where, and stick to it.


Anonymous said...

I hope Maynard is OK to bat, whatever "minor injuries" actually means in the official website post. By the standard of how some matches are reported, that could be as bad as missing an entire limb. Poor Maynard - the rest of them only felt like they were in a car accident!

I think the weather might be important to how this pitch plays. Looking at the pictures of how sunny it was, the Sussex tail batting on might have partially been down to that and not just purely to Apocalypse Surrey and bowling issues.

So, if the weather is OK tomorrow, there is a chance we can try to fight for the draw. From the Sussex batting collapse we can see it isn't just us who have found the pitch a nightmare when the weather is bad.

GreenJJ said...

Haha! Well let's hope they are as minor as possible - he's pretty crucial to our season.

You're quite right about the weather, both the collapses came at times when the pitch was getting a sprinkling of rain and the players were on and off, the bulk of the heavy run scoring was done in the sun when the pitch had settled down - so we have to hope for the best tomorrow, at the moment, the forecast looks good. We either want really good weather, or really bad weather...nothing in between!

Paul A said...

We desperately need to recruit at least one good opening bat, although it is probably too late for this season. There appears to be no one at the club capable of fulfilling this role - nearly everyone has had a go with modest returns. We have Davies, Roy, Hyphen, Maynard and Zander De Bruyn who are suited to No.5 or 6 in the batting order. You may be able to get away with makeshift openers in Division 2 but not against quality bowlers in Division 1. This has been a problem for the past three seasons and it is a poor reflection on Adams' management that it has not been resolved. I hope the team can show some fight and save the game tomorrow - but I fear a heavy defeat will set the tone for the second half of the Championship season.

GreenJJ said...

Yes, completely agree, the lack of openers has cost us dear this season, partly because its resulted in the rest of the order being rejigged here and there more or less every game. I guess Adams would argue that no quality openers have been available, but we've been linked with Porterfield, Denly and Sayers all of whom chose not to come, for reasons unknown to me. I'm not sure any of the players he's tried in the slot have been given much of a run there either, except Davies and lo and behold this game he's down the order again! Very confusing. Think Adams needs to buck his and the teams ideas up fast, outside of that four match winning streak courtesy of Ojha last year, I think we've only won 10 matches in three and a half seasons....

ucas said...

I actually enjoyed reading through this posting.Many thanks...